> At this stage it looks like the taxpayer will be footing the bill for twice-annual booster shots for everyone. This is just not sustainable Isn't it? Not spe

> At this stage it looks like the taxpayer will be footing the bill for twice-annual booster shots for everyone. This is just not sustainable Isn't it? Not speaking to its wisdom, but it seems entirely sustainable from a financial perspective - some napkin math suggests that the all-in costs of that frequency of vaccination would be <1% of the federal budget of a typical developed country.