> Number one there absolutely is extensive research on gaming and its potential physiological ramifications. The parent comment suggested there isn't, and the

> Number one there absolutely is extensive research on gaming and its potential physiological ramifications. The parent comment suggested there isn't, and the reply I gave was modulo this assumption. If you say there is extensive research, give it to the parent comment. > by your logic you could justify restricting anything in the entire universe by stating that there isn't sufficient research You do a strawman argument here, your interpretation of my argument is self-servingly absurd. The parent comment wanted to discard one of the alternatives because there's too little research. I objected saying that if there's not enough research, this makes the two alternatives equally favorable (not that it strengthens the other alternative!).