> You don't have to like them yourself, but it seems a bit much to imply that they are objectively without value as art. There is nothing objective about art a

> You don't have to like them yourself, but it seems a bit much to imply that they are objectively without value as art. There is nothing objective about art anyway. I agree with you, though. There is something in these. Some kind of motion. Some kind of primitive, wild instincts as well. As if a bear had found a camera, and he were more interested by ladies than about anything else.