4 ms·

D-Day failed to achieve most of its operational objectives on day 1. However, this is mostly a case of "running behind schedule" rather than outright failure; t

D-Day failed to achieve most of its operational objectives on day 1. However, this is mostly a case of "running behind schedule" rather than outright failure; three months later, the Falaise Pocket is closed and the Germans no longer had the ability to even contain the Allies to Normandy. Concomitant with the closure of the Falaise Pocket, the Allies landed on the Gold Coast of France (Operation Dragoon), and this forced the Germans out of the rest of the France. However, for an amphibious assault, especially one against a prepared and well-fortified enemy, "not being pushed back into the sea" is by far the most important operational objective to succeed, and D-Day succeeded very much at that.

WalterBright 5y ago
I'm a little surprised the Germans didn't direct all their V1 and V2 production at the D-Day staging areas along the British coast. I doubt it could have stopped the invasion, but would have made it much more costly.
- baud147258 5y ago
  I'm not sure V1 and V2 had the required precision to strike such targets
  - jcranmer 5y ago
    The first time Germany launched a rocket to try to strike a tactical target was I believe the Ludendorff Bridge after the bridge failed to detonate. Hitler was so unnerved by the prospect of the Allies holding an intact crossing of the Rhine that he ordered every available resource be used to destroy it, which included some V2 rockets. The V2 rockets I believe did more damage to the cities in German hands than to Allied positions (including the bridge itself, which was unharmed by the attack).
  - WalterBright 5y ago
    Given the size of the staging areas, and the density of men & materiel there, perhaps not much precision was required.
redis_mlc 5y ago
That's correct. You can think of the Normandy invasions as succeeding in slow-motion. Planners were hoping for results on D-Day, but it took 10x to 100x longer than expected to achieve each objective. Caen (port area up to 9 miles from the beach) was a D-Day objective, but depending on the area took 1 month to 3 months to capture. The Allies were slow, and the Germans knew it was a strategic location. Regardless, it just meant that the German army was destroyed around Caen, instead of elsewhere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_for_Caen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_for_Caen Of the 5 landing sites, Omaha Beach was the bloodiest, with Americans wading ashore into machine gun fire, killing around 2,000 Americans. (In Italy and Holland, Americans were also mowed down as the Germans retreated.) The most famous disastrous amphibian landings were Galipoli in WW1, where the British failed to break out of their beach heads, and also lost numerous ships to mines and shore batteries. This tarnished Winston Churchill's reputation for decades. The victory by Turkey led to its rise as a modern state. And the US struggled with 3 landings (Anzio, etc.) in Italy in WW2 due to General Clark and his staff trying to consolidate beach heads before breaking out, allowing Germans to occupy high ground, after the landings! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Anzio#Breakout https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Anzio#Breakout Literally, the Americans would loiter on the sand instead of sending a dozen troops to secure roads and hills before the Germans arrived with artillery. The US had phenomenal leaders in the Pacific War, but Italy was a total failure in multiple dimensions. Historians today just laugh at our role in Italy - it was that bad. (The British had the weird problem that upon reaching the beach, soldiers would sit down and start making tea, even under fire.)

WalterBright 5y ago

I'm a little surprised the Germans didn't direct all their V1 and V2 production at the D-Day staging areas along the British coast. I doubt it could have stopped the invasion, but would have made it much more costly.

baud147258 5y ago
I'm not sure V1 and V2 had the required precision to strike such targets
- jcranmer 5y ago
  The first time Germany launched a rocket to try to strike a tactical target was I believe the Ludendorff Bridge after the bridge failed to detonate. Hitler was so unnerved by the prospect of the Allies holding an intact crossing of the Rhine that he ordered every available resource be used to destroy it, which included some V2 rockets. The V2 rockets I believe did more damage to the cities in German hands than to Allied positions (including the bridge itself, which was unharmed by the attack).
- WalterBright 5y ago
  Given the size of the staging areas, and the density of men & materiel there, perhaps not much precision was required.

redis_mlc 5y ago

That's correct. You can think of the Normandy invasions as succeeding in slow-motion. Planners were hoping for results on D-Day, but it took 10x to 100x longer than expected to achieve each objective. Caen (port area up to 9 miles from the beach) was a D-Day objective, but depending on the area took 1 month to 3 months to capture. The Allies were slow, and the Germans knew it was a strategic location. Regardless, it just meant that the German army was destroyed around Caen, instead of elsewhere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_for_Caen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_for_Caen Of the 5 landing sites, Omaha Beach was the bloodiest, with Americans wading ashore into machine gun fire, killing around 2,000 Americans. (In Italy and Holland, Americans were also mowed down as the Germans retreated.) The most famous disastrous amphibian landings were Galipoli in WW1, where the British failed to break out of their beach heads, and also lost numerous ships to mines and shore batteries. This tarnished Winston Churchill's reputation for decades. The victory by Turkey led to its rise as a modern state. And the US struggled with 3 landings (Anzio, etc.) in Italy in WW2 due to General Clark and his staff trying to consolidate beach heads before breaking out, allowing Germans to occupy high ground, after the landings! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Anzio#Breakout https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Anzio#Breakout Literally, the Americans would loiter on the sand instead of sending a dozen troops to secure roads and hills before the Germans arrived with artillery. The US had phenomenal leaders in the Pacific War, but Italy was a total failure in multiple dimensions. Historians today just laugh at our role in Italy - it was that bad. (The British had the weird problem that upon reaching the beach, soldiers would sit down and start making tea, even under fire.)