Indeed, would be different. Nobody understands the large scale interplay of an evolving virus in presence of monoculture vaccine. What today is a godsend could

Indeed, would be different. Nobody understands the large scale interplay of an evolving virus in presence of monoculture vaccine. What today is a godsend could prove to be a downside tomorrow. Are we supposed to never consider worse case scenarios because we have a solution right now that even its producer admits is subject to future risks? The intuition struggles. In modern era we have deployed monocultures at scale, from industrialized agriculture to industrialized forestry, at great detriment to a healthy ecosystem and perennial at risk of pests. https://www.environmentbuddy.com/environment/pros-and-cons-of-monoculture-farming-monocropping/#pest-vulnerability https://www.environmentbuddy.com/environment/pros-and-cons-o... https://www.environmentbuddy.com/environment/pros-and-cons-of-monoculture-farming-monocropping/#increased-pesticide-herbicide https://www.environmentbuddy.com/environment/pros-and-cons-o... As of Ivermectin, clinicians reached for it in hope of anti-inflamatory properties. Note how we are sniping at each other using gargantuan strawmen. Instead, perhaps researchers / clinicians could figure out ways boost the Ivermectin signal, as small as it is, and perhaps turn it into a useful tool.