3 ms·
A lot of the discussion here is focused on teachers because we think that they are the keystone to a quality education. I would argue that teachers are a vital
by kaptain 15y ago
A lot of the discussion here is focused on teachers because we think that they are the keystone to a quality education. I would argue that teachers are a vital part but they lack the power that family and culture have. In many Asian cultures, the power of the family is crushing and the values that the parents have translate to intense pressure to do well in the education environment. It doesn't matter if your teacher is good; the message is that you will force yourself to succeed in education.
Even though Western values are quickly taking root here, (via the movies, music, etc.), there exists a tremendous amount of cultural pressure to "excel academically" (for some definition of this idea). I speak mainly for China because that is the education system I'm most familiar with, but I assume that we can find similar patterns in other Asian cultures: mom and dad work 5 am to 8 pm selling egg pancakes for 50 cents a pop on the side of the street while little Johnny (or Jenny) goes to school from 7 am to 4 pm with a two hour break between 12 pm and 2 pm. When they get home, they get to look forward to 6 hours of homework. No going to soccer, maybe some piano lessons if you're rich enough. Certainly no time for video games, making out with your girlfriend, creating a gang, doing drugs (although there are exceptions, I'm speaking in broad generalizations here…).
But there does not exist this idea that you can be who you want to be, that somehow you can have a good life by developing other talents. There's also not this idea that you have a choice. I've encountered college students that tell me that they /have to/ graduate. This means that if they don't pass their tests, they will find some other way to get their diploma.
Compare this to your typical attitudes towards education in America. I'm not saying that one is better than the other, I'm just saying that there is so much pressure engrained in certain cultures "to do well" (i.e. score high on a standardized test) that makes it hard for American culture to compete.
This explanation does not explain why European cultures fare much better. I'd love to hear what some of the cultural attitudes towards education are from there as well as the strength of family influence.
- yummyfajitas 15y agoThis explanation does not explain why European cultures fare much better. Actually, this explanation does work pretty well for that also. Assume for the moment that Americans of European descent and Europeans have similar cultures. Americans of European descent achieve test scores which are comparable to the top European nations + Australia. http://super-economy.blogspot.com/2010/12/amazing-truth-about-pisa-scores-usa.html http://super-economy.blogspot.com/2010/12/amazing-truth-abou... The only reason the US as a whole does not fare as well as most European nations is because it's large proportion of non-Europeans drag the average down. You get similar results when comparing Americans with Asian culture to Asians. Your culture explanation has a lot of explanatory power, and almost certainly more explanatory power than any explanation based on school system. http://super-economy.blogspot.com/2011/01/how-well-do-above-average-american.html http://super-economy.blogspot.com/2011/01/how-well-do-above-...
- bugsy 15y agoInternational comparative test scores seem kind of irrelevant. What seems to be important are the contributions of a small number of members of a society, who are either beaten into submission of forced conformity, or allowed to flourish.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]