"posting facts that were inconvenient to the mainstream Covid narrative"; debatable. Whole article is rife with hyperbole and strong, strong opinions stated as

"posting facts that were inconvenient to the mainstream Covid narrative"; debatable. Whole article is rife with hyperbole and strong, strong opinions stated as fact. Censorship is bad, but pretending to be an expert doesn't make you a martyr if you get axed. I've never been convinced by the argument that places like Twitter, Facebook, etc are open forums for discussion, and that all of your rights in the public sphere immediately transfer to these private places. Open to being persuaded otherwise.