4 ms·
"Masks and vaccines do far less than you've been led to believe." What is this based on?
by CabSauce 5y ago
"Masks and vaccines do far less than you've been led to believe."
What is this based on?
- the_doctah 5y agoProbably numbers from countries with high vaccination rates (Israel) that continue to be inundated with new cases[1] It's pretty clear the the vaccine does not stop transmission of the virus. [1] - https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/08/20/1029628471/highly-vaccinated-israel-is-seeing-a-dramatic-surge-in-new-covid-cases-heres-why https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/08/20/1029628...
- CabSauce 5y ago"That means only 58% of Israel's total citizenry is fully vaccinated." "But Israel paid a price for the early rollout. Health officials, and then Pfizer, said their data showed a dip in the vaccine's protection around six months after receiving the second shot." That doesn't exactly fit your narrative, imo.
- the_doctah 5y agoI was agreeing with the claim that the vaccines aren't as effective as the public was initially led to believe. A dip in effectiveness after 6 months seems to follow that line of reasoning just fine. No one should be reasonably expected to get a booster every 6 months. Side note: I also can't stand when the "total vaccinated %" includes children. We all know they can't be vaccinated yet and any total % vaccinated that includes them is disingenuous. I realize it was my source, but I digress.
- failrate 5y agoThe dip in effectiveness is because unvaccinated people got infected, and the creation of variants is correlated with the number of infections.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]