3 ms·
This matches my take. The problem is that these companies are serving two distinct roles: 1. Knowledge dissemination and preservation 2. Community consensus
by horsawlarway 5y ago
This matches my take. The problem is that these companies are serving two distinct roles:
1. Knowledge dissemination and preservation
2. Community consensus and reputation building
SciHub is the obvious answer to problem number 1. It costs literally nothing to distribute this knowledge to the community, and I'd call attempts to recreate the distribution channel foolish and misguided (at best).
Number 2 is much harder. When I was in academia (and watching my wife go through a Masters and then a PhD in a science related field) SciHub was an excellent way to find and read a paper, but it was not an excellent way to judge the quality or trustworthiness of that paper.
- rito_ 5y ago> but it was not an excellent way to judge the quality or trustworthiness of that paper. How is this a problem? You knew where the paper was originally published, right?