3 ms·
Sure, but that doesn't mean they're a good doctor. Most of us have had experiences with bad doctors. The exams they took could have been decades ago, but what d
by UncleOxidant 5y ago
Sure, but that doesn't mean they're a good doctor. Most of us have had experiences with bad doctors. The exams they took could have been decades ago, but what does that tell us about how they've performed recently?
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 5y agoBad doctor is relative. I expect that most doctors who have pass through that gauntlet can pass the doctor equivalent of fizzbuzz, which already is a lot different than our industry.
- dopylitty 5y agoA doctor equivalent of fizzbuzz could be “what do you prescribe for a viral infection with no indication of a secondary infection” and from what I’ve heard there are a lot of doctors failing that one during the COVID pandemic by prescribing antibiotics.
- sjburt 5y agoThey are highly effective at making patients stop begging for antibiotics they don't need. Patient satisfaction with their doctor has nothing to do with medical outcomes.
- cratermoon 5y ago> prescribing antibiotics. I'd hire that one over anyone pushing horse de-wormer, anti-malarial drugs, or homeopathic remedies.
- rsynnott 5y agoWell, it's less dangerous than the first two, generally, but roughly equivalent to the third, for covid.
- Ginden 5y agoIt's quite hard to be really bad physician - because Pareto principle applies to medicine. As far as I remember, 5 autoimmune diseases (of >120 described; ~4%) make up for 80% of total autoimmune diseases. My relative did research on kidney diseases and results were similar.