3 ms·
Because few people already carry FM store radios in their pocket, so relying on them requires solving a logistical problem.
by afarrell 5y ago
Because few people already carry FM store radios in their pocket, so relying on them requires solving a logistical problem.
- athenot 5y agoTrue, but the FM solution could really be low latency, unlike the digital rube goldberg machine equivalent.
- rahimnathwani 5y agoIt will be more reliable than any solution based on either (i) a battery-powered web server, or (ii) mobile internet. And latency will be constant and near-zero. I suspect that's why a couple of the use cases you mentioned (city tours, dance parties) are usually addressed with FM radio and not apps. Perhaps there's a way to do this with a modern bluetooth stack. But none of the offline messaging apps I've seen (Bridgefy, Meshenger) support group audio.
- PeterisP 5y agoWhat's wrong with the reliability of mobile internet? I'd expect that in the target environment (e.g. some building in the middle of a city) mobile internet would be like 100% reliable, that would be a problem only in remote wilderness areas.
- rahimnathwani 5y agoThe things I had in mind: 1. I sometimes participate in Zoom/Meet calls when walking around SF. Not often enough to have a representative sample, but I know I've had a non-zero number of 1-2 second drops. 2. Students are often on a budget, and may have data caps on their mobile plans. Running out of data towards the end of the month might be OK if you're mostly in your room or the library. But it might impede you from participating in a lecture if you're walking out of wifi range.