3 ms·
Par for the course for a uni press release, unfortunately. Not picking on Stanford at all, it just seems to be a common theme Unfortunately the paper is not op
by rsfern 5y ago
Par for the course for a uni press release, unfortunately. Not picking on Stanford at all, it just seems to be a common theme
Unfortunately the paper is not open access and I don’t think there’s a preprint, but from my quick read it seems pretty competently executed. (I’m a materials scientist but not a battery researcher.)
The cool thing about this paper IMO is that they’ve found a way to make rechargeable an established battery concept that’s known for high energy density. It also seems like maybe the cathode degradation over time could be better than in conventional solid state Li-ion tech, but I’m not really sure
- JumpCrisscross 5y ago> Not picking on Stanford at all, it just seems to be a common theme Fair to pick on Stanford when they put out releases containing false information. That other institutions also lie isn't an excuse.
- rsfern 5y agoFair enough, I don’t mean to excuse this, just making it clear that I’m not singling anyone out