3 ms·
Spot on. Elsewhere in the thread gsreenivas mentions that the solution is too expensive for spammers and so they haven't had a problem with that yet, so we've
by guerrilla 5y ago
Spot on.
Elsewhere in the thread gsreenivas mentions that the solution is too expensive for spammers and so they haven't had a problem with that yet, so we've actually moved to the original solution to spam: charge for sending e-mail*. The original proposal was to charge per email but an annual subscription would have the same effect in the right market (for now.)
* Wasn't it Bill Gates who suggested that?
- ddalex 5y agoBut isn't this charging also for receiving?