3 ms·
I think that idea is fundamentally wrong. Essentially that means that if there is a governmental conflict might is right. So wait for any dispute (the example I
by reillyse 5y ago
I think that idea is fundamentally wrong. Essentially that means that if there is a governmental conflict might is right. So wait for any dispute (the example I gave of trump disputing election results suffices) and then invade. That doesn’t seem to be how things should work.
- fastball 5y agoA "dispute" is not at all the same thing as a literal civil war and/or actual power vacuum. And yes, when existing power and societal structures fail, might is right. That is how the world works.