> I said they're designed and tested to prevent serious disease, not infection, and therefore transmission is expected to continue to a significant extent even

> I said they're designed and tested to prevent serious disease, not infection, and therefore transmission is expected to continue to a significant extent even after we achieve high rates of vaccination. I agree then. > So I'll ask again, in what way was @belter wrong in your opinion? I assumed he would make an argument about covid vaccines being ineffective. His actual argument he later made was that the unvaccinated are not solely to blame for spreading of the disease. Which he's right about. But it's a shallow victory because the unvaccinated are actually largely to blame. He's arguing against a strawnan. In the context of the article, presumably it's an argument that the teacher was not negligent for not getting vaccinated, but I don't agree with that.