3 ms·

And the Dave Kleiman who is second author on this paper is that Dave Kleiman, the one who most likely invented bitcoin. Wright has claimed to be Satoshi Nakamo

by dzdt 5y ago

And the Dave Kleiman who is second author on this paper is that Dave Kleiman, the one who most likely invented bitcoin. Wright has claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto but has proven himself to be a liar on this topic; by his actions he clearly believes that Kleiman controlled the Satoshi bitcoin fortune before his untimely death.

nullc 5y ago
Dave Kleiman had absolutely nothing to do with the creation of Bitcoin. Prior to his death Kleiman was IT support staff for a small county sheriff's department in Florida. He has no relevant expertise -- e.g. the only evidence of Kleiman ever writing any program ever was a simple visual basic script to automate checking the windows registry for forensic information. Literally the only thing remotely suggesting any connection is documents from Wright which are provably forged and created after Dave's death. [Wright's forgeries tend to be extremely bad: Stuff like changing the year in emails but not fixing the day of the week and misspelling Dave's name -- in emails supposedly from Dave. Accidentally producing unmodified originals, citing laws that didn't exist until years later, using software versions that didn't exist until years later, referencing URLs on his own domain names that he didn't register until years later, accidentally producing "dave"'s private keys in discovery ... but they're also extremely numerous, so it's easy to get smothered under the total mass of them.] Wright invoked his former friend in his scheme posthumously to solve a specific logistical problem: Wright himself can't program (certainly not in C/C++). So in his forgeries he included someone who couldn't contradict his stories so that Wright could beg off his inability to answer questions as "Dave did that part". Fortunately for Wright, it turned out that none of the eligible victims asked any hard questions. Unfortunately for Wright, Dave's family came after him for their share of the fortune Wright claimed they created together. Fortunately for Wright, Dave didn't actually help him (because neither had early involvement in Bitcoin). Unfortunately for Wright, all the easily proved forgeries in the case with the estate end up making it look like Wright is covering up the involvement to hide what he owes. Wright's frogurt is cursed, but also doesn't exist. (So that's good?) Kleiman isn't the only deceased person that Wright involuntarily enlisted into his con-- Wright as also claimed that he was aided by Gareth Williams (some MI6 spy that was in the news at the time Wright started spinning this yarn) and David Rees -- an older academic who was disabled and unresponsive in a care home at the time Wright claimed to have been working with him.
- oudekaas 5y ago
  you sure take your time to discredit Craig don’t you Greggles…… For those reading Greg Maxwell’s rant (founder of Blockstream/ hijacker of Bitcoin), just be careful using someone with obsessive compulsive harrassive behaviour as a trustworthy source, especially when there is financial bias involved. Greg Maxwell has been harrassing Craig for years now, he is obsessed by Craig and BSV, and wants to see it fail for obvious reasons, if Craig turns out to be Satoshi (hint: he is……) and proves this in court (yes Craig is dying to prove it in court) it will highlight the massive consumer fraud, Blockstream is complicit in. You may want to figure out why Greg is so obsessed about BSV, maybe just maybe…. BSV is the original Bitcoin design that allows nanotx and has been shown to be capable of handling large scale transactions, defeating any purpose for BTC and ETH, and literally 99% of the crypto space to exist. Bitcoin does all, BTC does Jack! This is not investment advise, this is about highlighting fraud (Bitcoin’s rules were set in stone…… by Satoshi, like monopoly most people tend to play by the rules. Not Greggles though, he prefers to see a Bitcoin being played by his rules……..
- TOGE 5y ago
  Greggles, enough of you. Take a break from your craig derangement. Read a book or listen to music.
- myoffices 5y ago
  The Satoshi Nakamoto emails were compromised in 2013 & available on the dark web & that was when the Faketoshi saga took form. Too bad these are the elements we all have to deal with years later. Bitcoin was formed in C then translated to C++. Too bad for Crack that he has only began to realize that Satoshi Nakamoto is a group with wide reach and several people.

by dzdt 5y ago

nullc 5y ago

Dave Kleiman had absolutely nothing to do with the creation of Bitcoin. Prior to his death Kleiman was IT support staff for a small county sheriff's department in Florida. He has no relevant expertise -- e.g. the only evidence of Kleiman ever writing any program ever was a simple visual basic script to automate checking the windows registry for forensic information. Literally the only thing remotely suggesting any connection is documents from Wright which are provably forged and created after Dave's death. [Wright's forgeries tend to be extremely bad: Stuff like changing the year in emails but not fixing the day of the week and misspelling Dave's name -- in emails supposedly from Dave. Accidentally producing unmodified originals, citing laws that didn't exist until years later, using software versions that didn't exist until years later, referencing URLs on his own domain names that he didn't register until years later, accidentally producing "dave"'s private keys in discovery ... but they're also extremely numerous, so it's easy to get smothered under the total mass of them.] Wright invoked his former friend in his scheme posthumously to solve a specific logistical problem: Wright himself can't program (certainly not in C/C++). So in his forgeries he included someone who couldn't contradict his stories so that Wright could beg off his inability to answer questions as "Dave did that part". Fortunately for Wright, it turned out that none of the eligible victims asked any hard questions. Unfortunately for Wright, Dave's family came after him for their share of the fortune Wright claimed they created together. Fortunately for Wright, Dave didn't actually help him (because neither had early involvement in Bitcoin). Unfortunately for Wright, all the easily proved forgeries in the case with the estate end up making it look like Wright is covering up the involvement to hide what he owes. Wright's frogurt is cursed, but also doesn't exist. (So that's good?) Kleiman isn't the only deceased person that Wright involuntarily enlisted into his con-- Wright as also claimed that he was aided by Gareth Williams (some MI6 spy that was in the news at the time Wright started spinning this yarn) and David Rees -- an older academic who was disabled and unresponsive in a care home at the time Wright claimed to have been working with him.

oudekaas 5y ago
you sure take your time to discredit Craig don’t you Greggles…… For those reading Greg Maxwell’s rant (founder of Blockstream/ hijacker of Bitcoin), just be careful using someone with obsessive compulsive harrassive behaviour as a trustworthy source, especially when there is financial bias involved. Greg Maxwell has been harrassing Craig for years now, he is obsessed by Craig and BSV, and wants to see it fail for obvious reasons, if Craig turns out to be Satoshi (hint: he is……) and proves this in court (yes Craig is dying to prove it in court) it will highlight the massive consumer fraud, Blockstream is complicit in. You may want to figure out why Greg is so obsessed about BSV, maybe just maybe…. BSV is the original Bitcoin design that allows nanotx and has been shown to be capable of handling large scale transactions, defeating any purpose for BTC and ETH, and literally 99% of the crypto space to exist. Bitcoin does all, BTC does Jack! This is not investment advise, this is about highlighting fraud (Bitcoin’s rules were set in stone…… by Satoshi, like monopoly most people tend to play by the rules. Not Greggles though, he prefers to see a Bitcoin being played by his rules……..
TOGE 5y ago
Greggles, enough of you. Take a break from your craig derangement. Read a book or listen to music.
myoffices 5y ago
The Satoshi Nakamoto emails were compromised in 2013 & available on the dark web & that was when the Faketoshi saga took form. Too bad these are the elements we all have to deal with years later. Bitcoin was formed in C then translated to C++. Too bad for Crack that he has only began to realize that Satoshi Nakamoto is a group with wide reach and several people.