3 ms·
It isn’t sexual abuse for a jailer to not fuck the people they’re jailing. Describing it as abuse because of the logic that people who are in prison can’t reaso
by SamoyedFurFluff 5y ago
It isn’t sexual abuse for a jailer to not fuck the people they’re jailing. Describing it as abuse because of the logic that people who are in prison can’t reasonably non-coercively consent to sex with the people who are controlling every aspect of their life doesn’t make sense in the context that it isn’t abuse to not have sex.
- DangitBobby 5y agoThat's not at all what the original comment said. It said, to paraphrase, that denying teenage boys their sexual agency is itself a form of abuse. I have no idea where you even got your original idea.
- ufmace 5y agoThere was a pretty good SSC article on kind of the same subject: https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/04/04/determining-consent/ https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/04/04/determining-consent/ Basic idea is, yeah it feels a very wrong and likely to cover up lots of serious abuse to say that jailers are allowed to have sex with their inmates. But if you're in custody in a same-sex facility and jailers are the only people of the opposite sex you're ever in contact with, it seems also a little wrong to effectively say you're not allowed to have any sex with anyone ever (presuming you're not homosexual of course).