I think I agree with you in a broader sense, but I don’t understand why this case in particular seems to be an issue. > "That research had never been done. I c

I think I agree with you in a broader sense, but I don’t understand why this case in particular seems to be an issue. > "That research had never been done. I could say no more than everything matched, and we couldn't say it definitely wasn't him” This seems to be exactly correct. It explicits says that it was not possible given the information at time to confidently identify someone from a photo, but that there was enough information to positively rule out identification in some cases - and that that wasn’t the case here.