4 ms·

> "Hot singles in your nearby area." This doesn't sound like standard English either, though.

• rrrrrrrrrrrryan 5y ago
  If it's good enough for the New York Times, it's good enough for me: https://ludwig.guru/s/nearby+area https://ludwig.guru/s/nearby+area
  • kbelder 5y ago
    Bad rule of thumb, in general.
  • garbagetime 5y ago
    You missed a key word. I'm not against the use of the phrase "nearby area" which is obviously acceptable, just like "nearby" + any_noun is acceptable. Anyway, there are also plenty of cases - although they rarely occur - where the phrase "your nearby area" could be used. This just isn't one of them. https://ludwig.guru/s/your+nearby+area https://ludwig.guru/s/your+nearby+area Hot singles in a nearby area would make sense Hot singles in your nearby area doesn't make sense, because it is unclear what the intention of the word "nearby" is. It clearly modifies "area". So the area is nearby something. By what is it nearby?
    • dogma1138 5y ago
      This analogy fails because distance on a cosmological scale means both space and time whilst on smaller scales we measure space and time as two distinct parameters. If we go with the single analogy it would be like filtering on Tinder based on distance as well as when the last time that account was active. It’s like if going more than 50 miles further out of your existing location would only show tinder accounts from 5 years ago which wouldn’t be relevant for what you are looking for which are people who are single right now and looking right now.