> but the article quite clearly stated that Black is not making unwarranted claims about the accuracy I agree the she or the article are not making any claims.

> but the article quite clearly stated that Black is not making unwarranted claims about the accuracy I agree the she or the article are not making any claims. And she eventually got the study done. But by appearing in court as expert witness and presenting her analysis, she implicitly claimed that it's accurate enough to be taken as criminal evidence, and that was before doing the science. That's the dangerous part.