>The Afghan military surrendered over a week ago. While we were still in a position to decommission equipment I don't know what you're defining as being "still

>The Afghan military surrendered over a week ago. While we were still in a position to decommission equipment I don't know what you're defining as being "still in a position" or what your basis is for that determination, but we all witnessed that chaos ensued quickly upon the collapse of the Afghan govt/military. At that point, it seems the priority was on saving lives and extricating human beings which was meeting with significant difficulty to say the least. That's a much more plausible explanation for why decommissioning the equipment was not prioritized. The situation is bad. The 20-year occupation itself was horrible foreign policy. But just making unfounded allegations of "corruption" is FUD.