3 ms·
I'm fine for empathy for people who have children. I'm not fine with people who challenge my decision to be without children as "forgo[ing] a natural and essent
by ebiester 5y ago
I'm fine for empathy for people who have children. I'm not fine with people who challenge my decision to be without children as "forgo[ing] a natural and essential part of life" and being responsible for society "becom[ing] ever grimmer and coarser..."
We don't need 16 billion people in the next century. But to the point of the article, my choice to not replicate is not a choice to avoid work life balance. That said, it does mean I may be able to take more risks because I don't have as many people depending on me. This is not a bad thing to have a mix of stability and risk-taking in society.
- Jare 5y agoI 100% agree that society should support and encourage all ways of life, but I have to disagree so hard on characterizing the responsibility of raising a family as "risk-free". :)
- ebiester 5y agoFrom another perspective: having dependents reduces some avenues of risk that one might otherwise pursue.