Have predicted for years that electronic voting would cause civil unrest because in a highly contested election, it does not provide adequte physical evidence o

Have predicted for years that electronic voting would cause civil unrest because in a highly contested election, it does not provide adequte physical evidence of vote integrity. The whole idea of electronic voting is designed to forfeit the integrity of a process whose entire legitimacy depends on the integrity of that process. As they say, this isn't the first time they stole from us, it's just the first time they've been caught. Anyone who has scratched the surface of this issue is unlikely to be persuaded by new assurances about new electronic voting controls, other than committed partisans who are fine if it's rigged in their favour. The more interesting question is, what are the knock on effects of a popular loss of confidence in western elections held with these machines?