3 ms·
Again, you're assuming that a full explanation is necessary simply because someone might want to be heard, which isn't true. Moreover, you haven't given much e
by SantalBlush 5y ago
Again, you're assuming that a full explanation is necessary simply because someone might want to be heard, which isn't true. Moreover, you haven't given much explanation for why you think that's true, which supports my point.
Regarding things like OpenCourseware, etc., that's not about anyone being obligated to support their position to people asking questions, which is what we're discussing. I never said people can't consult video or a book to learn more, but it's not the same thing as demanding answers from any expert and obligating them to explain. You're basically changing the subject now, and you've proved my points pretty well, so I think we're done here.
- Natsu 5y agoWhen I say it's necessary, I'm not talking about obligating others to do things, I'm simply saying it's a fact. It's necessary or people will remain uninformed. Given that you've badly misconstrued what I'm saying, then randomly declared victory despite not really even being in the same book, let alone on the same page as me... yeah we're done here. But as noted, we both still tried to explain our points. Actions speak louder than words, etc.