3 ms·
> something like this always comes up Unsurprisingly. > which just so happens to coincide with when they really started getting into computing On my first jo
by Const-me 5y ago
> something like this always comes up
Unsurprisingly.
> which just so happens to coincide with when they really started getting into computing
On my first job I've used Windows NT 4. Yet I agree with GP Windows 7 was the peak UX.
- least 5y agoThe comment about it coinciding when they started was slightly tongue-in-cheek, but surprisingly often holds true. My comment more broadly is just pointing out that most people making these arguments are doing so subjectively while framing them as objective.
- Const-me 5y ago> most people making these arguments are doing so subjectively while framing them as objective On subjects like that, I don't believe objective arguments are even possible. UX is similar to art or politics, it's inherently subjective because it's about people and culture. Ask a caveman to compare UX of Windows 7 and 10, and they gonna tell both are equally useless. Despite no objective arguments is possible, it might exist a consensus.