3 ms·
Not just archiving of published documentation - they’re poor at archiving internally too. If you’ve ever been to some old heritage industrial site like a texti
by jl6 5y ago
Not just archiving of published documentation - they’re poor at archiving internally too.
If you’ve ever been to some old heritage industrial site like a textile mill or other Victorian-era factory, you’ll notice them displaying old records like lists of customers, the employee payroll, notes between managers discussing events, and other items of historical interest.
None of that will exist to future historians of our current industries. Privacy regulations, data lifecycle policies, absence of respect for corporate memory, and fear of legal discovery - these are all going to leave a black hole.
The only things that will get preserved are the “important” things like board papers and financial statements. But those are not the things that give insight into corporate life.
- whoaisme 5y agoYeah it's remarkable how all business records of old timey businesses have survived the years and not a shred of contemporary business records will exist in the future. In the future people will definitely have a better understanding of historical corporate life better than our contemporary corporate life because they will have much less data about us compared to people that came centuries before us. PS are you totally daft LOL
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- HPsquared 5y agoSounds like we need "just one more rule" to enforce record-keeping.
- endymi0n 5y agoExcept that it runs counter to the rules that enforce record deletion. Right now the path companies need to tread on is already razor thin: Companies are already feeling the heat from both sides. Customers already sue because right after account deletion their personal data still exists in backups and database tombstones — while on the other hand, others sue for not being able to resurrect accounts with years of data after their accounts got hacked. There are no winners here. Long term archival as a lesser concern is one of the major losers in this confict.
- cheschire 5y agoThat feels like a false equivalence, this is about preserving knowledge, not preserving user data.
- ghaff 5y agoThat means someone needs to go through everything and decide what is sensitive and not sensitive, both from a business perspective and with respect to privacy laws. I recently went through a bunch of older board meeting minutes and related materials from a non-profit because we were considering donating it to an archive. I scanned a few things but basically decided there was too much potentially sensitive stuff. Yeah, it was old but just too much dirty laundry that someone could take out of context that it wasn't worth the scrubbing.
- massysett 5y agoThis is survivorship bias. Plenty of old Victorian-era businesses vanished without a trace, and today you’re seeing just the small fraction of things that survived, not the entire records of the business. Meanwhile, in current businesses some employees keep diaries, some records get out through litigation, others are filed with governments, etc.
- cheschire 5y agoIt's hard to find the balance between collaborative internal improvement, regulatory documentation requirements, and corporate naval gazing.
- FredPret 5y agoWhat about that guy who always prints out every email?