> AOC is fairly against Amazon and was one of the loudest voices against Amazons HQ2 in NYC. What relevance does this have? I’m saying that Amazon and other te

> AOC is fairly against Amazon and was one of the loudest voices against Amazons HQ2 in NYC. What relevance does this have? I’m saying that Amazon and other tech companies responded to a request for censorship of conservative voices emerging from liberal politicians. Carrying out their request as they come into power following an election is not somehow better because AOC blocked Amazon’s bid for NYC as their second headquarters. > I’m not aware of BLM supporting any kind of property destruction or violent protests. Then you’re either extremely unaware of current events, or lying. Obviously BLM organized events included a significant amount of rioting, death, and destruction. A simple google search will reveal billions in damage and at least double digit deaths. You mentioned you work for Amazon - then surely you are aware of the numerous businesses destroyed by BLM activists, the near daily illegal blockades of highways near you, and a literal attempt to declare a sovereign territory (CHAZ), assuming you work at their Seattle headquarters. > The “one day riot” was an attack on America’s Congress. No it wasn’t. It was just people protesting, then getting carried away, trespassing, and committing property damage. There was no great conspiracy to “attack congress” and the FBI’s investigation found there was no coordinated conspiracy to do anything more. This is also why almost all the charges from Jan 6 are for simple trespassing. > nor do we support an attempt to overthrow America’s democracy because one group can’t handle losing an election No one was attempting to overthrow America’s democracy. Show me your evidence. If your claiming that distrusting or challenging election results is wrong, then you need to find a justification for the Democrats formally doing so in 2000, 2004, and 2016. > Btw… much of that was organized on Parler. Since you’re still intent on spreading misinformation, I’ve gone ahead and pulled evidence to the contrary (https://thefederalist.com/2021/02/22/court-docs-show-facebook-played-much-bigger-part-in-capitol-riot-than-parler-yet-no-consequences/ https://thefederalist.com/2021/02/22/court-docs-show-faceboo...). If you seek out a diversity of information it is pretty easy to know Parler didn’t play a significant role in the Capitol riot. > I find it ironic that you dismiss an all out attack on America’s Congress as a “one day riot” An “all out attack” on Congress is the kind of hyperbole that enabled the politically motivated censorship of Parler by abusive companies like Amazon. If you think people protesting on a lawn is an “all out attack”, what phrasing do you reserve for an actual attack? And where was this fervor when Democratic politicians incited a riot at the Capitol during Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing? > I won’t engage with any further You’ve literally shared no evidence for your false and hyperbolic claims and are now running away from the conversation. I can only guess it is because you know the facts aren’t on your side.