3 ms·
I’m fairly positive 90% of any feature in emacs being unchanged in decades is directly attributable to backwards-compatibility than anything else. With how inva
by setr 5y ago
I’m fairly positive 90% of any feature in emacs being unchanged in decades is directly attributable to backwards-compatibility than anything else. With how invasive emac scripts can be, it’s difficult to imagine anything to be changed without forcing the question: is it worth breaking userspace for this?
I don’t think the defaults are good — I suspect they’re stuck.