3 ms·

If it was so common why not provide documented evidence? It would seem like a pretty important thing to document, assuming it actually happened.

barbacoa 5y ago
After big tech stepped in to ban news articles on Biden selling political influence to foreign nationals most people stopped even considering these kind of things conspiracy. But to OP's point on joebiden.info: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/hr30p3/reddit_facebook_ban_website_of_joe_biden_touching/ https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/hr30p3/reddit_f...
- rejectedandsad 5y ago
  He's President and won with 81M votes. Your crying won't change that, just so you know.
  - DonHopkins 5y ago
    Oh let him cry please, I'm enjoying it. ;)
  - Thorrez 5y ago
    I don't really see how what you're saying is relevant. It's possible for someone to be validly elected and also for negative stuff about that person to be blocked on some websites.
    - barbacoa 5y ago
      In the greater scheme biden's corruption isn't really noteworthy. Everyone in DC has their loser kid on corporate boards, or are running a phony charity, or taking in speaking fees from those they are regulating, or taking campaign contributions in exchange for political favors. The alarming part of the laptop story was the rapid response big tech took to censor it.
      - rejectedandsad 5y ago
        Probably because it's all bullshit spun up as a foreign intelligence operation.
dpbriggs 5y ago
It happened. This website has a blurb about it https://censortrack.org/case/joebideninfo https://censortrack.org/case/joebideninfo. I tried it a few months ago and it was blocked. Here's a screenshot I made of it: https://i.imgur.com/KZa60db.jpg https://i.imgur.com/KZa60db.jpg
- divx_dev 5y ago
  That website needs proofreading, it does not instil confidence in your case. If it actually happened, it would be trivial to record it happening and to share that recording. But this makes it clear you are just trying to throw more confusion onto the election.
  - dpbriggs 5y ago
    Do you think I'm making this up? I experienced this. Apparently from sibling comments it no longer occurs, and I do not possess a time machine. I'm not going to jump through hoops to prove this for you - please do some cursory online research. This is bewildering. I have no agenda nor care enough to comment about a foreign country's election.
  - Thorrez 5y ago
    joebiden.info is allowed currently, but thedonald.win is blocked currently. If you want me to screen record the blocking of thedonald.win I can, but I'd rather not screen record my FB messenger page because there's private information there, and editing that out of the screen recording would take some extra work.
    - eitland 5y ago
      Also you cannot always convince all people. If you had an actual recording one could always ask the question if it was created using an elaborate mock up or something.

barbacoa 5y ago

After big tech stepped in to ban news articles on Biden selling political influence to foreign nationals most people stopped even considering these kind of things conspiracy. But to OP's point on joebiden.info: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/hr30p3/reddit_facebook_ban_website_of_joe_biden_touching/ https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/hr30p3/reddit_f...

rejectedandsad 5y ago
He's President and won with 81M votes. Your crying won't change that, just so you know.
- DonHopkins 5y ago
  Oh let him cry please, I'm enjoying it. ;)
- Thorrez 5y ago
  I don't really see how what you're saying is relevant. It's possible for someone to be validly elected and also for negative stuff about that person to be blocked on some websites.
  - barbacoa 5y ago
    In the greater scheme biden's corruption isn't really noteworthy. Everyone in DC has their loser kid on corporate boards, or are running a phony charity, or taking in speaking fees from those they are regulating, or taking campaign contributions in exchange for political favors. The alarming part of the laptop story was the rapid response big tech took to censor it.
    - rejectedandsad 5y ago
      Probably because it's all bullshit spun up as a foreign intelligence operation.

dpbriggs 5y ago

It happened. This website has a blurb about it https://censortrack.org/case/joebideninfo https://censortrack.org/case/joebideninfo. I tried it a few months ago and it was blocked. Here's a screenshot I made of it: https://i.imgur.com/KZa60db.jpg https://i.imgur.com/KZa60db.jpg

divx_dev 5y ago
That website needs proofreading, it does not instil confidence in your case. If it actually happened, it would be trivial to record it happening and to share that recording. But this makes it clear you are just trying to throw more confusion onto the election.
- dpbriggs 5y ago
  Do you think I'm making this up? I experienced this. Apparently from sibling comments it no longer occurs, and I do not possess a time machine. I'm not going to jump through hoops to prove this for you - please do some cursory online research. This is bewildering. I have no agenda nor care enough to comment about a foreign country's election.
- Thorrez 5y ago
  joebiden.info is allowed currently, but thedonald.win is blocked currently. If you want me to screen record the blocking of thedonald.win I can, but I'd rather not screen record my FB messenger page because there's private information there, and editing that out of the screen recording would take some extra work.
  - eitland 5y ago
    Also you cannot always convince all people. If you had an actual recording one could always ask the question if it was created using an elaborate mock up or something.