There was this analogy about programming language proponents. Language A has features 1, 2, and 3. Language B has features 1, 2, and 4. Language A user thinks

There was this analogy about programming language proponents. Language A has features 1, 2, and 3. Language B has features 1, 2, and 4. Language A user thinks they're superior because they have feature 3, which B lacks. B's feature 4 they don't understand, but they've never needed it so it's useless. Language B user thinks the opposite, of course. (this was much better explained in an article that graced HN a while back, and I can't find anymore)