4 ms·
I'll admit I am not a good pick when it comes to computer semantics, so I might be mistaken. Trying to be an "app" or not: For me, it is about the courtesy of
by blauwbilgorgel 15y ago
I'll admit I am not a good pick when it comes to computer semantics, so I might be mistaken.
Trying to be an "app" or not: For me, it is about the courtesy of respecting my main OS settings. It is about introducing accessibility concerns by overriding system settings such as demonstrated in this active bug report from 2008: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=92 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=92
> They aren't going to, and shouldn't, waste their time
It looks like they are going to, and really should fix this bug report. Improving the usability, interoperability and accessibility of your "app" or "operating system" is not a waste of time. You'd have a hard time backing that up.
- MatthewPhillips 15y agoMy point wasn't that they shouldn't fix bugs; it's that they shouldn't prioritize fixing OS-specific bugs that impact 0.2% of their users. It sounds like you are a Windows power user and I suggest you use IE9 instead.
- chimeracoder 15y agoI'm pretty sure more than .2% of Chrome users use Windows.