3 ms·
Makes more sense in the context of the war, where two sides are close and whoever gets there first wins. Here I do not understand the end game, stalling tactic
by wudangmonk 5y ago
Makes more sense in the context of the war, where two sides are close and whoever gets there first wins.
Here I do not understand the end game, stalling tactics until there is a U.S administration willing to goto war with Iran?
- MattGaiser 5y agoCould just be buying more time to find a better endgame.
- flyinglizard 5y agoThat, or perhaps until there’s an internal regime change; but there are other geopolitical implications for a nuclear Iran. It would allow Iran to operate its proxies (in Lebanon, Gaza, Yemen, Syria and Iraq) with even greater impunity. Beyond that, a publicly nuclear Iran would push the region to a nuclear arms race (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, maybe Turkey).
- lostlogin 5y ago> until there is a U.S administration willing to goto war with Iran? US driven regime change has a rather poor track record. This week in particular.