>The Lisp programmers I've encountered are along a wider range. They've ranged from average to ML tier, the latter being the ones that, as PG observes, are more

>The Lisp programmers I've encountered are along a wider range. They've ranged from average to ML tier, the latter being the ones that, as PG observes, are more interested in "weird" features like macros, call/cc, and so on. I'd say that since there's lack of Haskell jobs, then non passionate people do not touch it since it's useless to them Passionate people check it out cuz other passionate people recommended it And circle repeats.