17 ms·
More proof that these platforms have zero content moderation and actually do not give a shit until somebody notices. I don’t see how such examples make their co
by mberning 5y ago
More proof that these platforms have zero content moderation and actually do not give a shit until somebody notices. I don’t see how such examples make their content policies and enforcement thereof highly questionable within the legal system.
- belltaco 5y agoAre the free speech absolutionists against this move or not?
- oceanplexian 5y agoDid banning the app magically stop ISIS and end terrorism? The terrorists will circumvent this and use some other app while law-abiding people continue to have their human rights infringed on by censorship and deplatforming.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 5y agoIt infringes Amazon's rights. Why should they be forced to host this? > The company took down the site, which touted the suicide attack that killed at least 170 people in Kabul, after The Post reported extremists were using the service 170 people. 13 service members. Amazon wants no part of this and that is their right.
- torstenvl 5y ago> free speech absolutionists I'm sure this was unintentional, but hilarious nonetheless.
- Hikikomori 5y agoHow would they notice it?
- xyzzy21 5y agoIf the "correct politically aligned group" tells them about it. If it's the "incorrect" group, it will be ignored.
- tyingq 5y agoTrying to proactively police all websites hosted on your VM based infrastructure is probably pretty hard. Scraping your IP space for keywords in many languages is a blunt tool and probably has too many false positives. I don't know if people had reported it to their abuse system and that process failed. If that's the case, then they have work to do.