3 ms·
They're not pearl clutching church goers enforcing their morality on everyone. They're concerned about real objective harm like revenge porn, videos of sexual
by treis 5y ago
They're not pearl clutching church goers enforcing their morality on everyone. They're concerned about real objective harm like revenge porn, videos of sexual assault, leaked videos, child porn, and so on.
- vermontdevil 5y agoNot really. They are more concerned about government cracking down on the banks due to these acts.
- danaris 5y agoNo, they're concerned about "real objective harm" to their business—like the fundamentalist/evangelical Protestant churches in the US collectively deciding to target them (in various ways) because said churches think they're the arbiters of an absolute morality that decrees that taking pleasure in sex is a sin. The things you mention are 100% policeable separate from porn production in general.
- treis 5y ago>The things you mention are 100% policeable separate from porn production in general. Yes, and that's what banks are asking porn producers to do. To implement policies and procedures to ensure that those types of videos aren't on their site.
- alexashka 5y agoHow do you know that?