3 ms·
A plant in the field can only take advantage of the extra co2 if there is adequate inputs but it does not do the plant harm if not. It would be like giving a ci
by bobbytit 5y ago
A plant in the field can only take advantage of the extra co2 if there is adequate inputs but it does not do the plant harm if not.
It would be like giving a city as much food as they want irrespective of individual need.
- masklinn 5y ago> A plant in the field can only take advantage of the extra co2 if there is adequate inputs but it does not do the plant harm if not. Sure, but the nutritional issue with plants is generally with macronutrients the plant itself doesn't need, or at least not at the concentrations we'd prefer. Furthermore your assertion is not true, like pretty much everything else that lives plants will absolutely gorge themselves as long as they don't otherwise have limits on their ability to do so, even if it harms them. It's very rare for organisms to have evolutionary limits on that as they'll either be constrained (either by the food source or by an external threat of some sort) or living under boom-and-bust cycles (whether naturally or because humans have removed the external threat, very common in game animals and rodents).
- bobbytit 5y agoPhotosynthesis is limited by the availability of light, water and co2. They can't gorge without sufficient amounts if all three. At what point did they remove photosynthesis from the curriculum?
- bobbytit 5y agoand temperature.. without the warmth you guys are so scared of there would be no life
- tsimionescu 5y agoIf you think bigger temperature implies more life, why don't you set fire to your own home to make it more livable?
- bobbytit 5y agoDid you steal that sick burn from Greta?
- tsimionescu 5y agoSorry, but when you claim that global warming is not a big problem because "we need warmth", there is no way of taking you seriously, so I could only joke.
- masklinn 5y ago> without the warmth you guys are so scared of there would be no life You don't seem to realise that heating things up is pretty easy, even in a preindustrial society, while cooling things is extremely difficult and there is a hard and quite low limit to how hot we can remain for long periods of time. At 35 WBT we're done for, literally can't cool down, die in a few hours even with no activity whatsoever, in the shade, with wind or a fan. As we go above 1.5, the tropics will become literally unlivable as they will regularly exceed 35 WBT.
- bobbytit 5y agoWet bulb temp is the latest wank in what has been the biggest propaganda exercise of all time. You have been misled. You are being deliberately turned against the human race.
- tsimionescu 5y agoYou have this precisely the opposite. The huge propaganda machine of industrial interests has been leading an effort to bury this very real threat to humanity for 50 years, in the name of corporate profits.