Remote workers should then charge Google for use of their homes as office space, telephone, internet connection, lighting, office supplies. Seems like that wou

Remote workers should then charge Google for use of their homes as office space, telephone, internet connection, lighting, office supplies. Seems like that would make up the 25%. Remote workers should cost Google less overall even with no pay cut because Google doesn't have to pay all that office overhead and studies show remote workers are more productive and put in more hours. So they could give remote workers a raise and still save money. If the argument is that the higher salary compensates for the high cost of city housing then should the workers who happen to find and live in cheaper housing also get a pay cut, even if they come into the office? Can workers get a pay raise by moving to a more expensive house?