3 ms·
The paper is comedy gold. The data says one thing but when you read his conclusion one of the reasons he gives to ignore the data is 'ethnic restaurants'. Hilar
by shadilay 5y ago
The paper is comedy gold. The data says one thing but when you read his conclusion one of the reasons he gives to ignore the data is 'ethnic restaurants'. Hilarious. This is not how you're supposed to do science. Data is supposed to inform the conclusion and not the other way around.