I was pretty disappointed by this article; I'd expected to see something compelling here and there just wasn't anything there. I try not to be swayed by proofr

I was pretty disappointed by this article; I'd expected to see something compelling here and there just wasn't anything there. I try not to be swayed by proofreading issues and the like, but starting the article off implying that the Paul Graham "Equity" essay (which is clearly labeled to be from July 2007) was written a few days ago as a response to her colleague's Y Combinator critique set a really bad tone for the article.