3 ms·
That's a good point, and it might scare some people away, but the same model already exists for Qt, and is very successful there. Sure, nobody knows how success
by est31 5y ago
That's a good point, and it might scare some people away, but the same model already exists for Qt, and is very successful there. Sure, nobody knows how successful Qt would have been had it been MIT licensed. But still, people do buy Qt. Generally, the moment you sell something you can also afford licenses for a library, because money gets involved.
- nyanpasu64 5y agoMuch as Qt attempts to convince its users otherwise, the core of Qt is LGPL and can be dynamically linked with proprietary apps. SixtyFPS's GPL license has no such option, though the ambassador license may fulfill the same purpose (to some extent, while it lasts).