3 ms·
Yeah, that would be a few millenia patent. Its really a false equivalency..
by tartoran 5y ago
Yeah, that would be a few millenia patent. Its really a false equivalency..
- onethought 5y agoI know. Let’s excuse the rules when it doesn’t convenience us. How about using drug addiction to force trade… then complaining that party doesn’t follow the trade rules? I love how we talk about how “China doesn’t follow the rules”… and completely ignore the context of how they were dragged into the game unwillingly
- mc32 5y agoWHAT rules need excusing? they did not exist back then.
- onethought 5y agoBut what if one disagrees with the creation of said rules. US could always stop trade with China… sanction them, like Iran, no?
- otterley 5y agoDon't change the subject, Paid Chinese Agent. We know who you are.
- onethought 5y agoNot changing the subject. 100% China thinks about that context constantly. They don’t think the rules of trade or fair, and actively exploit them. Sometimes people don’t think like you do, and that’s okay. It doesn’t mean they are paid by nefarious actors or are state shills.
- gjs278 5y agohow much is china paying you to post here
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]