I'm disappointed in the discussion here. Any comment that remotely alludes to any information that might contradict the US gov official story is being downvote

I'm disappointed in the discussion here. Any comment that remotely alludes to any information that might contradict the US gov official story is being downvoted. Why are people resistant to entertain opposing viewpoints on this story? It seems unscientific (and bad journalistic practice) to rely only on one source.