3 ms·
1. That's debatable. Some would argue every person is entitled to a good life in absence of any actions that would take that entitlement away. 2. It's not abou
by franga2000 5y ago
1. That's debatable. Some would argue every person is entitled to a good life in absence of any actions that would take that entitlement away.
2. It's not about anyone owing anyone anything. You can go to the city and have a small chance at a good life or move to Alaska and have guaranteed survival but nothing more. It's a tradeoff like any other. What it isn't is people rushing to live in a big city out of convenience despite the alternative being just as good otherwise, which is what people often claim - that's what I was talking about.