4 ms·
The stuff falling onto the black hole has an orientation -- it forms an accretion disk at the "equator". If the black hole is spinning, it has poles. We expect
by wumpus 5y ago
The stuff falling onto the black hole has an orientation -- it forms an accretion disk at the "equator".
If the black hole is spinning, it has poles. We expect all black holes to be spinning. This is a subtle change in the shadow itself, but...
And if the accretion disk and black hole have misaligned poles, there should be a huge warp in the disk close to the black hole as the black hole frame-drags the accretion disk.
- ludwigschubert 5y agoIs the misalignment _necessary_? I always thought the hole got its rotation from the infalling matter.
- wumpus 5y agoOver billions of years, the angular momentum of the stuff falling in changes.
- yawaworht1978 5y agoBut if it's infinitely small(not the event horizon, the black holes singularity), then a rotation or poles are hard to imagine. Is the singularity rotating or the whole event horizon area? It's hard to put this in descriptive words, i hope my point gets across.
- drewrv 5y agoYeah I thought about this and looked into it a little bit. A "point" has zero dimensions so my intuition thought that there's nothing TO spin. What happens at the singularity in a rotating black hole depends on your quantum theory of gravity. Some theories have the singularity as a "ring" instead of a point. I believe loop quantum gravity has a "planck star" in the center of a black hole. Macroscopically, rotating black holes can be thought of as rotating the space around the event horizon. So the spacetime curvature doesn't just pull you directly to the center, there's an angular aspect as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_star https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_star https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjgGdGzDFiM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjgGdGzDFiM