4 ms·
It’s controversial because nobody can package and sell “natural” immunity. Given that there are about 7.5B people in the world, RNA injections are, apparently,
by sk2020 5y ago
It’s controversial because nobody can package and sell “natural” immunity. Given that there are about 7.5B people in the world, RNA injections are, apparently, only good for 90 days, and that Pfizer (or someone) gets $20/injection, the market is about $600B a year.
Do you remember 20 years ago when the people on TV said that terrorism was an existential and imminent threat and the result was defense and surveillance companies made massive fortunes? The more things change…
Just kidding. Public opinion shaping campaigns are a dangerous conspiracy theory and nobody of any public office or Fortune 500 company ever lied for money and nobody ever tried RNA injections for humans until, like, just now.
- aww_dang 5y agoPlease also consider the incentives for vaccine passports and "verified digital identities".
- archagon 5y ago> RNA injections are, apparently, only good for 90 days Er, what?
- thehappypm 5y agoPerhaps they're referring to 90 days of storage?
- wankerrific 5y agoJust like encouraging people to run around unvaccinated and mask free keeps your donors who make a $2000 per treatment Regeneron very happy.
- SV_BubbleTime 5y agoIs this a dig on Fauci who just decided he recommendeds it? Or on DeSantis who has a investment firm donor who is not even in the top100 investors in the antibody treatment company? Side question, do you fall for smear campaigns without fact checking the claims yourself?
- kiba 5y agoYou can only get natural immunity by getting the virus and hoping you don't die. Sure Pfizer makes lot of money from the living, but I guess they will make less money since some of us are no longer among the living. I guess the funeral industry will be very happy, indeed. The welfare state saves money on not having to care for a sick elderly person...