3 ms·
It depends entirely if he's actually responsible for that created value. Maybe he didn't actually do anything special that anyone else couldn't have also done.
by ahtihn 5y ago
It depends entirely if he's actually responsible for that created value. Maybe he didn't actually do anything special that anyone else couldn't have also done. In that case why would he deserve that much money?
- Grustaf 5y agoWhile that is obviously a ludicrous idea, as a shareholder I don't really care if someone else also might have been able to do it. The fact is that Tim Cook DID preside over perhaps the most monumental value creation in corporate history, so I don't begrudge him the money. To be honest, I wouldn't even blink if he was paid 10 times more, and I don't even like him.