3 ms·
Openshot when I last tried it was a bit buggy / unpolished, and I opted for Kdenlive. Going to try this new version. It’s nice to see these editors improve!
by prox 5y ago
Openshot when I last tried it was a bit buggy / unpolished, and I opted for Kdenlive. Going to try this new version.
It’s nice to see these editors improve!
- greypowerOz 5y agofellow kdenlive user here, would really like to hear your findings... for some reason recent kdenlive releases seem to have inordinately slow render times on my laptop (no GPU ;) so I'm open to alternatives.. ps don't take this as an assault on kdenlive,please!! It's been good to me,,
- prox 5y agoI think the GPU helps alot, since my render times are usually very quick on Kden, like a couple of minutes tops for a short film edit. I am downloading now, will comment later!
- prox 5y agoI just tried it, and Openshot doesn’t have hardware acceleration beyond encoding, so preview is very choppy, this is on my windows box btw.
- rograndom 5y agoAre they comparable? I thought Openshot was like After Effects and Kdenlive was more like Premiere?
- Jiocus 5y agoThe Openshot proprietary analogue is more similar to Windows Movie Maker. Though the latter felt more useful and less error-prone
- prox 5y agoI don’t think both can compete for any true professional seats at the moment. Even on mobile LumaFusion is ten times better. Kdenlive has some use if you are amateur or if you edit every now and then. Sometimes you need something that splices videos and nothing much more, Kdenlive will meet those needs.