3 ms·
I think it was just a misreading. My suggestion was that being a part of a couple would provide stability, financial and emotional. I've been in both, and know
by flog 15y ago
I think it was just a misreading.
My suggestion was that being a part of a couple would provide stability, financial and emotional. I've been in both, and know i'm far more courageous with someone in my corner.
Plus, while I agree that this may affect his hunger for the business, I personally understand that my entrepreneurship is for the benefit of my loved ones, and not in-and-of itself valuable.
Conversely, I'm offended by your suggestion that for a woman to be in a relationship is somehow detrimental.
- groby_b 15y agoGlad I misread you, awesome you could return the favor ;) - we're going for the misinterpretation championships here. I'm not suggesting it's detrimental for a woman to be in a relationship. I'm suggesting it's easier to go ahead, follow your dreams, and take crazy risks when you're not in a relationship, independent of gender. Simply because less obligations mean failure is less of an issue. Note: This is about _starting_ as an entrepreneur, not being one. Obviously, there are many who make both their business and their relationship work just fine. (And I have no doubt many manage to start a business while in a relationship, too. It's just a little bit scarier/harder) Ultimately, as long as both you and your partner are good with it, do whatever works for you :)