3 ms·
Years are cyclic, no? EDIT: Months to be precise.
by nixpulvis 5y ago
Years are cyclic, no?
EDIT: Months to be precise.
- taeric 5y agoBut a year over year line chart already shows trends well enough. Splitting not by month, but by season, would be neat to see. But I'm sceptical there are any learnings to be had here.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- nixpulvis 5y ago> I'm not at all clear on why a standard line chart isn't better. > ... well enough.
- taeric 5y agoI'm not clear on what you are trying to say. My, "shows trends lines well enough" should be assumed as followed with "such that I do not see anything new in the post charts."