This article is spam. 1) It has been repeatedly submitted to hacker news. 2) It is link-bait seemingly designed for hacker news 3) It is nothing more than a

This article is spam. 1) It has been repeatedly submitted to hacker news. 2) It is link-bait seemingly designed for hacker news 3) It is nothing more than a transparent Ad for their game that they "spent hours" developing. 4) Nearly every sentence of the article is hyperbole. 5) The author has no credibility, and undermines the benefit-of-the-doubt with every sentence. 6) It reads like it was written by a 13 year old. Yet it is high on the first page of Hacker News.